Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cheng, Qing-Hao; Li, Peng-Biao; Lu, Ting-Ting; Guo, Shi-Fang; Di, Wen-Fei; Yang, Ke-Hu; Qian, Yao-Wen.
Afiliação
  • Cheng QH; Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
  • Li PB; Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
  • Lu TT; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, No. 222, Tianshui South Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
  • Guo SF; School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Di WF; Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
  • Yang KH; Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
  • Qian YW; Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 687, 2021 Nov 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34809649
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects between computer-assisted and traditional cannulated screw internal fixation on treating femoral neck fracture. METHODS: The search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database from the beginning to August 2020. RevMan5.4 software, which was provided by the International Cochrane Group, was used for the meta-analysis comparing the differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, total drilling times, Harris score, fracture healing rate, and femoral head necrosis rate between computer-assisted and traditional methods groups. RESULTS: A total of 1028 patients were included in 16 studies. Primary outcome indicators: Compared with the traditional method group, the computer-assisted group had less operative time (2RCTs, P < 0.00001; 8 non-RCTs, P = 0.009; Overall, P < 0.00001), intraoperative bleeding (1 RCTs, P < 0.00001; 9non-RCTs, P < 0.00001; Overall, P < 0.00001), femoral head necrosis rate (1 RCT, P = 0.11;7 non-RCTs, P = 0.09; Overall, P = 0.02) and higher Harris scores (1 RCT, P < 0.0001; 9 non-RCTs, P = 0.0002; Overall, P < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in fracture healing rate between the two groups (5 non-RCTs, P = 0.17). Secondary outcomes indicators: The computer-assisted group had a lower frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and total number of drills compared with the traditional method group, while there was no significant difference in fracture healing time. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional hollow screw internal fixation on the treatment of femoral neck fracture, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can shorten the operation time and improve the operation efficiency and reduce the X-ray injury of medical staff and help patients obtain a better prognosis. Therefore, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation is a better choice for the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Study registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42020214493.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas do Colo Femoral Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas do Colo Femoral Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article