Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Abnormal Spinopelvic Relationships be Identified by Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs?
Carender, Christopher N; Feuchtenberger, Bennett W; DeMik, David E; An, Qiang; Brown, Timothy S; Bedard, Nicholas A.
Afiliação
  • Carender CN; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
  • Feuchtenberger BW; Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
  • DeMik DE; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
  • An Q; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
  • Brown TS; Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
  • Bedard NA; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(3): 507-512, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843911
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Abnormal spinopelvic relationships may place patients at an increased risk for instability after primary total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if radiographic markers on a standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph could identify patients with sagittal spinopelvic imbalance or spinal stiffness.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2020 with standing AP pelvis radiographs and sitting/standing lateral radiographs were identified. AP pelvis radiographs were assessed for the following lumbosacral hardware, spine osteophytes, disc space narrowing, scoliosis>5°, pelvic obliquity>5°, and overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction/pubic symphysis. Patients with spinopelvic imbalance and/or spinopelvic stiffness were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS:

Four hundred eighty-six patients were included. Prevalence of isolated sagittal spinopelvic imbalance and isolated spinopelvic stiffness was 12% and 21%, respectively; 11% of patients had sagittal imbalance and stiffness. Overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction/pubic symphysis (OR = 10.2, 95% CI = 5.3-19.8) and presence of lumbosacral hardware (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 2.0-9.4) were markers of an increased risk of combined sagittal imbalance and stiffness. Seventy-nine percent of patients with overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction and pubic symphysis and 82% of patients with lumbosacral hardware had an abnormal spinopelvic relationship.

CONCLUSION:

Isolated sagittal imbalance and stiffness were difficult to predict on standing AP pelvis radiographs. Overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction/pubic symphysis and presence of lumbosacral hardware associated with a higher risk of combined sagittal imbalance/stiffness and were present in ≥79% of patients with an abnormal spinopelvic relationship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV; retrospective cohort study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Artroplastia de Quadril Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Artroplastia de Quadril Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article