Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Secondary Prophylaxis of Gastric Variceal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Osman, Karim T; Nayfeh, Tarek; Abdelfattah, Ahmed M; Alabdallah, Khaled; Hasan, Bashar; Firwana, Mohammed; Alabaji, Homam; Elkhabiry, Lina; Mousa, Jehan; Prokop, Larry J; Murad, M Hassan; Gordon, Fredric.
Afiliação
  • Osman KT; Department of Internal Medicine Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Clinic Burlington MA Evidence-Based Practice Center Mayo Clinic Rochester MN Division of Gastroenterology Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Clinic Burlington MA Department of MedicineDivision of Gastroenterology University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA Department of Internal Medicine Lincoln Medical Center Bronx NY Department of Internal MedicineWertachklinik Schwabmünchen Bavaria G
Liver Transpl ; 28(6): 945-958, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34860458
ABSTRACT
There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal approach for secondary prophylaxis of gastric variceal bleeding (GVB) in patients with cirrhosis. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of available treatments. A comprehensive search of several databases from each database's inception to March 23, 2021, was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes of interest were rebleeding and mortality. Results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. We included 9 RCTs with 647 patients who had histories of GVB and follow-ups >6 weeks. A total of 9 interventions were included in the NMA. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) was associated with a lower risk of rebleeding when compared with ß-blockers (RR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.26; low certainty), and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)-cyanoacrylate (CYA) (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77; low certainty). ß-blockers were associated with a higher risk of rebleeding compared with most interventions and with increased mortality compared with EIS-CYA (RR, 4.12, 95% CI, 1.50-11.36; low certainty), and EIS-CYA + nonselective ß-blockers (RR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.91-16.43; low certainty). Analysis based on indirect comparisons suggests that BRTO may be the best intervention in preventing rebleeding, whereas ß-blocker monotherapy is likely the worst in preventing rebleeding and mortality. Head-to-head RCTs are needed to validate these results.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas / Transplante de Fígado Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas / Transplante de Fígado Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article