Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Younger age is a significant factor for poorer adherence in fracture patients who received low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: A retrospective study.
Nakashima, Mitsuharu; Saito, Tomohiro; Takahashi, Tsuneari; Matsumura, Tomohiro; Takeshita, Katsushi.
Afiliação
  • Nakashima M; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan. Electronic address: m03066mn@jichi.ac.jp.
  • Saito T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
  • Takahashi T; Jichi Medical University Hospital Life Saving Emergency Center, Shimotsuke, Japan.
  • Matsumura T; Jichi Medical University Hospital Life Saving Emergency Center, Shimotsuke, Japan.
  • Takeshita K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
J Orthop Sci ; 28(1): 239-243, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872820
BACKGROUND: The factors for poor adherence to therapy in patients with postoperative fracture who are treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound remain unknown. Therefore, we designed a retrospective cohort study to determine the various factors for poorer adherence to therapy in patients with postoperative fracture who were treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of postoperative patients who underwent low-intensity pulsed ultrasound after fracture surgery from January 2010 to May 2019. The patients were categorized into two groups as follows: group G, including those with a good adherence rate (>72%), and group P, including those with a poor adherence rate (<72%). Factors, such as age, sex, how the rental cost of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound was paid (by the patients themselves or by the insurance company), living (alone or with someone), insurance claim item (fractures within 3 weeks after osteosynthesis or delayed or non-union fractures), low-intensity pulsed ultrasound device-type (earlier- or next-generation), duration of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound use, fracture site (upper or lower limb), frequency of hospital visits (regular or irregular), and employment status (employed/unemployed) were compared between groups G and P. RESULTS: In total, 96 patients (74 and 22 patients in groups G and P, respectively) who underwent low-intensity pulsed ultrasound were included in the study. Univariate analysis revealed that younger patients (P < 0.001) and patients who did not regularly visit the hospital (P = 0.024) were more likely to have poorer adherence to therapy. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age was the only independent, pertinent factor for poorer adherence to therapy (odds ratio, 8.570; 95% confidence interval, 2.770-26.50; P < 0.001), with a cutoff value of 41 years. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age is a significant factor for poorer adherence in patients undergoing low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Ultrassom / Fraturas Ósseas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Ultrassom / Fraturas Ósseas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article