Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tacrolimus time in therapeutic range and long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients.
Adie, Sarah K; Bitar, Abbas; Konerman, Matthew C; Dorsch, Michael P; Andrews, Chris A; Pogue, Kristen; Park, Jeong M.
Afiliação
  • Adie SK; Department of Pharmacy Service, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Bitar A; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Konerman MC; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Dorsch MP; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Andrews CA; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Pogue K; Department of Pharmacy Service, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Park JM; Department of Pharmacy Service, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Pharmacotherapy ; 42(2): 106-111, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882822
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

Little is known about the association between tacrolimus time in therapeutic range (TTR) within the guideline-recommended targets and heart transplant (HT) patient outcomes. This study evaluated the association of early tacrolimus TTR with rejection and other clinical outcomes during an extended follow-up after HT.

DESIGN:

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

The study was conducted at Michigan Medicine (1/1/2006-12/31/2017). PATIENTS HT recipients ≥18 years of age were included. MEASUREMENT The primary end point was the effect of tacrolimus TTR on time to rejection over the entire follow-up period. MAIN

RESULTS:

A total of 137 patients were included with a median follow-up of 53 months. Based on the median TTR of 58%, the patients were divided into the low tacrolimus TTR (n = 68) and high tacrolimus TTR (n = 69) cohort. The high tacrolimus TTR was associated with a significantly lower risk of rejection compared to the low tacrolimus TTR cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.98; p = 0.04). A post hoc analysis revealed associations between rejection and TTR when high and low TTR groups were created at different levels. TTR <30% was associated with a 7-fold higher risk of rejection (HR 7.56; 95% CI 1.76-37.6; p < 0.01) and TTR >75% was associated with a 77% lower risk of rejection (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.627; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients in the higher tacrolimus TTR cohort had a lower risk of rejection. We observed correlations between higher risk of rejection with TTR <30% and lower risk of rejection with TTR >75%. Future studies should focus on validating the optimal TTR cutoff while also exploring a cutoff to delineate high-risk patients for which early interventions to improve tacrolimus TTR may be beneficial.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article