Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Comparison of Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation and General Anesthesia for Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.
Kang, Seung Youn; Cho, Hae Sun; Yi, Jihwan; Kim, Hyeun Sung; Jang, Il Tae; Kim, Do-Hyeong.
Afiliação
  • Kang SY; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Cho HS; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Yi J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim HS; Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Jang IT; Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim DH; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: breadfans@yuhs.ac.
World Neurosurg ; 159: e103-e112, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34896355
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With advances and refinements in endoscopic lumbar spine surgery showing effective and satisfactory results, the need for simple yet effective anesthetic techniques for minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery has increased. The aim of this study was to compare feasibility and postoperative outcomes of fluoroscopy-guided epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery (≤3 levels).

METHODS:

Patients who underwent 1-3 levels of endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery under either fluoroscopy-guided epidural or general anesthesia between January 2019 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pain intensity and use of rescue analgesics for up to 48 hours were compared between the epidural and general anesthesia groups. Intraoperative anesthetic data and postoperative recovery profiles were also analyzed.

RESULTS:

Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural anesthesia group compared with the general anesthesia group at 10 minutes after recovery room admission (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 5.7 ± 1.9, P < 0.001), 24 hours postoperatively (3.3 ± 1.0 vs. 5.4 ± 1.8, P < 0.001), and 48 hours postoperatively (3.2 ± 0.6 vs. 4.4 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesics in the recovery room was significantly lower in the epidural anesthesia group (1.9% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.027). The median 15-item Quality of Recovery score on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the epidural anesthesia group (118.0 [113.5-123.0] vs. 82.0 [73.5-111.5], P < 0.001). Occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and voiding difficulty up to 48 hours postoperatively did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia provided better analgesia and recovery characteristics during the early postoperative period in endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sedação Consciente / Anestesia Epidural Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sedação Consciente / Anestesia Epidural Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article