Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CT radiomics models are unable to predict new liver metastasis after successful thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases.
Taghavi, Marjaneh; Staal, Femke Cr; Simões, Rita; Hong, Eun K; Lambregts, Doenja Mj; van der Heide, Uulke A; Beets-Tan, Regina Gh; Maas, Monique.
Afiliação
  • Taghavi M; Department of Radiology, 1228Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Staal FC; GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Simões R; Department of Radiology, 1228Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hong EK; GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Lambregts DM; Department of Radiotherapy, Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Heide UA; Department of Radiology, 1228Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Beets-Tan RG; GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Maas M; 58927Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acta Radiol ; 64(1): 5-12, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34918955
BACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who undergo thermal ablation are at risk of developing new CRLM after ablation. Identification of these patients might enable individualized treatment. PURPOSE: To investigate whether an existing machine-learning model with radiomics features based on pre-ablation computed tomography (CT) images of patients with colorectal cancer can predict development of new CRLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 94 patients with CRLM who were treated with thermal ablation were analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from the healthy liver parenchyma of CT images in the portal venous phase, before thermal ablation. First, a previously developed radiomics model (Original model) was applied to the entire cohort to predict new CRLM after 6 and 24 months of follow-up. Next, new machine-learning models were developed (Radiomics, Clinical, and Combined), based on radiomics features, clinical features, or a combination of both. RESULTS: The external validation of the Original model reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56-0.58) and 0.52 (95% CI=0.51-0.53) for 6 and 24 months of follow-up. The new predictive radiomics models yielded a higher performance at 6 months compared to 24 months. For the prediction of CRLM at 6 months, the Combined model had slightly better performance (AUC=0.60; 95% CI=0.59-0.61) compared to the Radiomics and Clinical models (AUC=0.55-0.57), while all three models had a low performance for the prediction at 24 months (AUC=0.52-0.53). CONCLUSION: Both the Original and newly developed radiomics models were unable to predict new CLRM based on healthy liver parenchyma in patients who will undergo ablation for CRLM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article