Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review.
Motamedi, Mina; Brandenburg, Caitlin; Bakhit, Mina; Michaleff, Zoe A; Albarqouni, Loai; Clark, Justin; Ooi, Meidelynn; Bahudin, Danial; Chróinín, Danielle Ní; Cardona, Magnolia.
Afiliação
  • Motamedi M; Australian Centre for Health Engagement Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  • Brandenburg C; Allied Health Services, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia.
  • Bakhit M; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
  • Michaleff ZA; Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
  • Albarqouni L; Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
  • Clark J; Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
  • Ooi M; Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
  • Bahudin D; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Chróinín DN; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
  • Cardona M; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 729, 2021 12 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34930177
BACKGROUND: Overtreatment in advanced age i.e. aggressive interventions that do not improve survival and are potentially harmful, can impair quality of care near the end of life (EOL). As healthcare provider perspectives on care quality may differ from that of service users, the aim of this study was to explore the views of older patients near EOL or their caregivers about the quality of health care at the EOL based on their lived experience, and to identify healthcare service improvements. METHODS: Medline and backward citation searches were conducted for qualitative or quantitative studies reported on the views of patients and/or informal caregivers about EOL care quality. Thematic analysis was used to summarise qualitative data (primary analysis); narrative and tabulations were used to summarise quantitative data (secondary analysis). RESULTS: Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. Five main qualitative themes regarding quality care emerged: (1) Effective communication between clinicians and patients/caregivers; (2) Healthcare that values patient preferences and shared decision making; (3) Models of care that support quality of life and death with dignity; (4) Healthcare services that meet patient expectations; and (5) Support for informal caregivers in dealing with EOL challenges. The quantitative articles supported various aspects of the thematic framework. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that many of the issues highlighted by patients or bereaved relatives have persisted over the past two decades. There is an urgent need for comprehensive evaluation of care across the healthcare system and targeted redesign of existing EOL care pathways to ensure that care aligns with what patients and informal caregivers consider high-quality patient-centred care at the EOL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Cuidadores Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Cuidadores Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article