Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions Reduce Inequalities in Common Mental Health Disorders? A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.
Tanner, Louise; Sowden, Sarah; Still, Madeleine; Thomson, Katie; Bambra, Clare; Wildman, Josephine.
Afiliação
  • Tanner L; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
  • Sowden S; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
  • Still M; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
  • Thomson K; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
  • Bambra C; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for the North-East and North Cumbria (NENC), Newcastle Upon Tyne NE3 3XT, UK.
  • Wildman J; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34948587
ABSTRACT
Common mental health disorders (CMDs) represent a major public health concern and are particularly prevalent in people experiencing disadvantage or marginalisation. Primary care is the first point of contact for people with CMDs. Pharmaceutical interventions, such as antidepressants, are commonly used in the treatment of CMDs; however, there is concern that these treatments are over-prescribed and ineffective for treating mental distress related to social conditions. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions, such as psychological therapies and "social prescribing", provide alternatives for CMDs. Little is known, however, about which such interventions reduce social inequalities in CMD-related outcomes, and which may, unintentionally, increase them. The aim of this protocol (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021281166) is to describe how we will undertake a systematic review to assess the effects of non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions on CMD-related outcomes and social inequalities. A systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods primary studies will be undertaken and reported according to the PRISMA-Equity guidance. The following databases will be searched Assia, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Scopus. Retrieved records will be screened according to pre-defined eligibility criteria and synthesised using a narrative approach, with meta-analysis if feasible. The findings of this review will guide efforts to commission more equitable mental health services.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Mental / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Mental / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article