Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reconciling the prospect of disease progression with goals and expectations: Development and validation of a measurement model in advanced cancer.
George, Login S; Polacek, Laura C; Lynch, Kathleen; Prigerson, Holly G; Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K; Atkinson, Thomas M; Epstein, Andrew S; Breitbart, William.
Afiliação
  • George LS; Institute for Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Polacek LC; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Lynch K; Department of Psychology, Fordham University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Prigerson HG; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Abou-Alfa GK; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Atkinson TM; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Epstein AS; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Breitbart W; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Psychooncology ; 31(6): 902-910, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34984756
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Among patients living with advanced, life-limiting illness, reconciling the prospect of disease progression with future goals and expectations is a key psychological task, integral to treatment decision-making and emotional well-being. To date, this psychological process remains poorly understood with no available measurement tools. The present paper develops and validates a measurement model for operationalizing this psychological process.

METHODS:

In Phase 1, concept elicitation interviews were conducted among Stage IV lung, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic cancer patients, their caregivers, and experts (N = 19), to further develop our conceptual framework centered on assimilation and accommodation coping. In Phase 2, draft self-report items of common assimilation and accommodation coping strategies were evaluated via patient cognitive interviews (N = 11).

RESULTS:

Phase 1 interviews identified several coping strategies, some of which aimed to reduce the perceived likelihood of disease progression (assimilation), and others aimed to integrate the likelihood into new goals and expectations (accommodation). The coping strategies appeared to manifest in patients' daily lives, and integrally related to their emotional well-being and how they think about treatments. Phase 2 cognitive interviews identified items to remove and modify, resulting in a 31-item measure assessing 10 assimilation and accommodation coping strategies.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present work derived a content-valid measure of the psychological process by which patients reconcile the prospect of disease progression with their goals and expectations. Further psychometric validation and use of the scale could identify intervention targets for enhancing patient decision-making and well-being.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Motivação / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Motivação / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article