Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Imaging Predict Hearing Outcomes in Children With Cochleovestibular Nerve Abnormalities?
Kari, Elina; Gillard, Danielle M; Chuang, Nathaniel; Go, John L.
Afiliação
  • Kari E; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
  • Gillard DM; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
  • Chuang N; Radiology, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
  • Go JL; Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope ; 132 Suppl 8: S1-S15, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35015297
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/

HYPOTHESIS:

To identify the imaging characteristics associated with better hearing outcomes found in cochleovestibular nerve (CVN) abnormalities treated with hearing aids and/or cochlear implantation (CI). STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective review.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was undertaken of 69 ears with CVN abnormalities seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) treated at a tertiary referral academic center analyzing the clinical features, imaging characteristics, and hearing data. We searched for associations among the hearing and imaging data, hypothesizing that the imaging data was not a good indicator of hearing function.

RESULTS:

In univariable analysis of all those who underwent aided testing (hearing aid and CI), health status (P = .016), internal auditory canal (IAC) midpoint diameter (P < .001), and number of nerves in the IAC (P < .001) were predictors of positive hearing outcome. Modiolar abnormalities, cochlear aperture diameter, cochlear malformations, vestibular malformations, and nerves in the cerebellar cistern did not predict hearing outcome (P = .79, .18, .59, .09, .17, respectively). For patients who received CI, health status (P = .018), IAC midpoint (P = .024), and number of nerves in the IAC (P = .038) were significant. When controlling for health status, IAC midpoint diameter (P < .001) and number of nerves in the IAC (P < .001) remained significant. In our cohort, one out of the eight ears (13%) with Birman class 0 or 1 exhibited responses to sound compared to nine out of 13 ears (70%) with Birman class 2-4.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current imaging modalities cannot accurately depict the status of the cochleovestibular nerve or predict a child's benefit with a CI. Cochlear implantation should be considered in children with abnormal cochleovestibular nerves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 132S1-S15, 2022.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implante Coclear / Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans / Infant Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implante Coclear / Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans / Infant Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article