Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perioperative Care in Colorectal Cancer Surgery before a Structured Implementation Program of the ERAS Protocol in a Regional Network. The Piemonte EASY-NET Project.
Pellegrino, Luca; Pagano, Eva; Allaix, Marco Ettore; Morino, Mario; Muratore, Andrea; Massucco, Paolo; Rinaldi, Federica; Ciccone, Giovannino; Borghi, Felice.
Afiliação
  • Pellegrino L; Oncological Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy.
  • Pagano E; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, 10126 Torino, Italy.
  • Allaix ME; Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10100 Torino, Italy.
  • Morino M; Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10100 Torino, Italy.
  • Muratore A; Surgical Department, E. Agnelli Hospital, 10064 Pinerolo, Italy.
  • Massucco P; Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano, 10100 Torino, Italy.
  • Rinaldi F; School of Medicine, University of Turin, 10100 Turin, Italy.
  • Ciccone G; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, 10126 Torino, Italy.
  • Borghi F; Oncological Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 10(1)2021 Dec 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35052236
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2019, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal cancer surgery was adopted by a minority of hospitals in Piemonte (4.3 million inhabitants, north-west Italy). The present analysis aims to compare the level of application of the ERAS protocol between hospitals already adopting it (ERAS, N = 3) with the rest of the regional hospitals (non-ERAS, N = 28) and to identify possible obstacles to its application.

METHODS:

All patients surgically treated for a newly diagnosed colorectal cancer during September-November 2019, representing the baseline period of a randomized controlled trial with a cluster stepped-wedge design, were included. Indicators of compliance to the ERAS items were calculated overall and for groups of items (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative) and analyzed with a multilevel linear model adjusting for patients' characteristics, considering centers as random effects.

RESULTS:

Overall, the average level of compliance to the ERAS protocol was 56% among non-ERAS centers (N = 364 patients) and 80% among ERAS ones (N = 79), with a difference of 24% (95% CI -41.4; -7.3, p = 0.0053). For both groups of centers, the lowest level of compliance was recorded for postoperative items (42% and 66%). Sex, age, presence of comorbidities and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were not associated with a different probability of compliance to the ERAS protocol.

CONCLUSIONS:

Several items of the ERAS protocol were poorly adopted in colorectal surgery units in the Piemonte region in the baseline period of the ERAS Colon-Rectum Piemonte study and in the ERAS group. No relevant obstacles to the ERAS protocol implementation were identified at patient level.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article