Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health care providers' ethical perspectives on waiver of final consent for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): a qualitative study.
Variath, Caroline; Peter, Elizabeth; Cranley, Lisa; Godkin, Dianne.
Afiliação
  • Variath C; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada. caroline.variath@mail.utoronto.ca.
  • Peter E; Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada. caroline.variath@mail.utoronto.ca.
  • Cranley L; Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellness, Humber College ITAL, 205 Humber College Blvd, Toronto, ON, M9W 5L7, Canada. caroline.variath@mail.utoronto.ca.
  • Godkin D; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
BMC Med Ethics ; 23(1): 8, 2022 01 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35094703
BACKGROUND: With the enactment of Bill C-7 in Canada in March 2021, people who are eligible for medical assistance in dying (MAiD), whose death is reasonably foreseeable and are at risk of losing decision-making capacity, may enter into a written agreement with their healthcare provider to waive the final consent requirement at the time of provision. This study explored healthcare providers' perspectives on honouring eligible patients' request for MAiD in the absence of a contemporaneous consent following their loss of decision-making capacity. METHOD: A critical qualitative methodology, using a feminist ethics theoretical lens with its focus on power and relationality, was used to examine how socio-political and environmental contexts influenced healthcare providers' moral agency and perspectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 healthcare providers (13 physicians, six nurse practitioners, nine nurses and two social workers) from across Canada who provide MAiD-related care. RESULTS: Themes identified include; (1) balancing personal values and professional responsibilities, (2) anticipating strengths and limitations of the proposed waiver of final consent amendment, (3) experiencing ethical influences on decisions to enter into written agreements with eligible patients, (4) recognizing barriers to the enactment of MAiD in the absence of a contemporaneous consent and (5) navigating the potential for increased risks and burden. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study in Canada to explore healthcare providers' perspectives on waiving the final consent for MAiD using a written agreement. Most participants supported expanding eligible people's access to MAiD following loss of capacity, as they believed it would improve the patients' comfort and minimize suffering. However, the lack of patients' input at the time of provision and related ethical and legal challenges may impact healthcare providers' moral agency and reduce some patients' access to MAiD. Providers indicated they would enter into written agreements to waive final consent for MAiD on a case-by-case basis. This study highlights the importance of organizational, legal and professional support, adequate resources, clear policies and guidelines for the safety and wellbeing of healthcare providers and to ensure equitable access to MAiD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suicídio Assistido Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suicídio Assistido Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article