Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Remote Dielectric Sensing Measurement.
Hori, Masakazu; Imamura, Teruhiko; Fukuo, Atsuko; Fukui, Takuya; Koi, Takatoshi; Ueno, Yohei; Onoda, Hiroshi; Tanaka, Shuhei; Ushijima, Ryuichi; Sobajima, Mitsuo; Fukuda, Nobuyuki; Ueno, Hiroshi; Kinugawa, Koichiro.
Afiliação
  • Hori M; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Imamura T; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Fukuo A; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Fukui T; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Koi T; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Ueno Y; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Onoda H; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Tanaka S; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Ushijima R; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Sobajima M; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Fukuda N; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Ueno H; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
  • Kinugawa K; Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama.
Int Heart J ; 63(1): 73-76, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35095079
ABSTRACT
Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a recently introduced non-invasive electromagnetic-based device used to quantify lung fluid levels. Nevertheless, its inter-rater and intra-rater reliability remain uncertain. In 10 healthy volunteers, ReDS values were measured three times successively by the officially trained expert examiner to validate intra-rater reliability. Similar measures were performed by a total of three examiners to validate inter-rater reliability. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was applied to validate each reliability. Ten healthy volunteers [median 34 (32, 40) years old, 10 men, body mass index 23.0 (21.2, 23.9) ] were included. Median ReDS value was 28% (25%, 31%). For the intra-rater reliability, ICC (1, 1) and ICC (1, 3) were 0.966 and 0.988, respectively (P < 0.001). For the inter-rater reliability, ICC (2, 1) and ICC (2, 3) were 0.683 and 0.866, respectively (P < 0.001). Given almost perfect intra-rater reliability, an examiner does not need to repeat ReDS measurement. Given substantial inter-rater reliability, ReDS measurements had better be measured by multiple examiners if possible.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Água Extravascular Pulmonar / Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto / Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Água Extravascular Pulmonar / Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto / Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article