Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Switch rates vary due to expected payoff but not due to individual risk tendency.
Broeker, Laura; Johnson, Joseph G; de Oliveira, Rita F; Ewolds, Harald E; Künzell, Stefan; Raab, Markus.
Afiliação
  • Broeker L; German Sport University Cologne, Institute of Psychology, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 5, 50933 Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: l.broeker@dshs-koeln.de.
  • Johnson JG; Miami University, Department of Psychology, 100B Psychology Building Oxford, OH 45056, USA. Electronic address: johnsojg@miamioh.edu.
  • de Oliveira RF; London South Bank University, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom. Electronic address: r.oliveira@lsbu.ac.uk.
  • Ewolds HE; Augsburg University, Institute of Sports Science, Universitätsstraße 3, 86135 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: harald.ewolds@sport.uni-augsburg.de.
  • Künzell S; Augsburg University, Institute of Sports Science, Universitätsstraße 3, 86135 Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.kuenzell@sport.uni-augsburg.de.
  • Raab M; German Sport University Cologne, Institute of Psychology, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 5, 50933 Cologne, Germany; London South Bank University, School of Applied Sciences, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom. Electronic address: raab@dshs-koeln.de.
Acta Psychol (Amst) ; 224: 103521, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35101739
ABSTRACT
When switching between different tasks, the initiation of task switches may depend on task characteristics (difficulty, salient cues, etc.) or reasons within the person performing the task (decisions, behavioral variability, etc.). The reasons for variance in switching strategies, especially in paradigms where participants are free to choose the order of tasks and the amount of switching between tasks, are not well researched. In this study, we follow up the recent discussion that variance in switching strategies might be partly explained by the characteristics of the person fulfilling the task. We examined whether risk tendency and impulsiveness differentiate individuals in their response (i.e., switch rates and time spent on tasks) to different task characteristics on a tracking-while-typing paradigm. In detail, we manipulated two aspects of loss prospect (i.e., "payoff" as the amount of points that could be lost when tracking was unattended for too long, and "cursor speed" determining the likelihood of such a loss occurring). To account for between-subject variance and within-subject variability in the data, we employed linear mixed effect analyses following the model selection procedure (Bates, Kliegl, et al., 2015). Besides, we tested whether risk tendency can be transformed into a decision parameter which could predict switching strategies when being computationally modelled. We transferred decision parameters from the Decision Field Theory to model "switching thresholds" for each individual. Results show that neither risk tendency nor impulsiveness explain between-subject variance in the paradigm, nonetheless linear mixed-effects models confirmed that within-subject variability plays a significant role for interpreting dual-task data. Our computational model yielded a good model fit, suggesting that the use of a decision threshold parameter for switching may serve as an alternative means to classify different strategies in task switching.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desempenho Psicomotor / Sinais (Psicologia) Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desempenho Psicomotor / Sinais (Psicologia) Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article