The treatment strategy and outcome for spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience in 239 patients.

PURPOSE: There exist no treatment guidelines for spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (srHCC) and its prognosis remains controversial. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively enrolled and grouped based on hemodynamics and tumor resectability. The 30-day mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), peritoneal metastasis (PM) and intrahepatic metastasis (IM) rates were compared. RESULTS: In general, 239 patients were classified into four groups: patients with stable hemodynamics underwent semi-elective hepatectomy (n = 119), and those with unstable hemodynamics received emergent hepatectomy (n = 17), sequential hemostatic-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)/-laparotomy with late hepatectomy (n = 49), or TACE only (n = 54). Hepatectomy was safer and provided better OS and PFS than TACE both before and after propensity score matching. Emergent hepatectomy was associated with higher 30-day mortality (6.2%, P < 0.05) and poorer prognosis whereas semi-elective hepatectomy and sequential treatment had comparable mortality (both 0%) and survival (36.3% vs 45.2%, P > 0.05). Compared with hemostatic TACE in the sequential treatment group, early surgical intervention (semi-elective hepatectomy, emergent hepatectomy, and sequential laparotomy with late hepatectomy) decreased PM (13.6% vs 34.2%, P = 0.003) whereas had higher IM (68.0% vs 50.0%, P = 0.039), but neither procedure had affected OS. In srHCC patients with high risk of recurrence (multiple tumors, micro- and macro-vascular invasion), postoperative adjuvant TACE improved OS. CONCLUSION: Hepatectomy could provide better prognosis than TACE for srHCC patients while semi-elective hepatectomy and sequential hemostatic-TACE with staged hepatectomy are viable options for srHCCs with stable and unstable hemodynamics, respectively.