Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients with a prior intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.
Dolatshahi, Mahsa; Sabahi, Mohammadmahdi; Shahjouei, Shima; Koza, Eric; Abedi, Vida; Zand, Ramin.
Afiliação
  • Dolatshahi M; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Neurology Department, Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
  • Sabahi M; Neurology Department, Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USANeurosurgery Research Group (NRG), Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  • Shahjouei S; Neurology Department, Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
  • Koza E; Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
  • Abedi V; Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Zand R; Neurology Department, Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA. Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord ; 15: 17562864221074144, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35126671
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) is considered a contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Objective:

This study aimed at comparing the safety of IVT among patients with and without a history of ICrH.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review of the literature. Data regarding all AIS patients with prior ICrH who received IVT were retrieved. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sHT), death within 90 days, and favorable and unfavorable 90-day functional outcomes based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) among stroke patients with and without prior ICrH.

RESULTS:

Out of 13,032 reviewed records, 7 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Quantitative synthesis of data regarding the rate of sHT (5068 patients) revealed no significant difference between the two groups [odds ratio, OR 1.55 (0.77, 3.12); p = 0.22]. However, a significantly higher risk of death within 90 days [OR 3.91 (2.16, 7.08); p < 0.00001] and a significantly higher 90-day poor functional outcomes (mRS, 4-6) [OR 1.57 (1.07, 2.30); p = 0.02] were observed among patients with prior ICrH. Likewise, the percentage of 90-day good functional outcomes (mRS, 0-1) was lower in the prior ICrH group [OR 0.54 (0.35, 0.84); p = 0.06]. Subgroup analyses in patients with a history of ICrH (based on both patients' medical history and imaging confirmation) revealed no significant between-group differences in rates of sHT. Also, sensitivity analysis consisting of only studies using standard-dose IVT showed no difference in sHT rates and 90-day outcomes between the two groups. There was no evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 >50%) among included studies.

CONCLUSION:

The results of this study indicated that prior history of ICrH does not increase the risk of sHT post-IVT, but it is associated with a higher risk of death and poor functional outcomes in 90 days.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article