Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Natural history of lower urinary tract symptoms among men undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer with and without a Rectal Hydrogel Spacer.
Alshak, Mark N; Eidelberg, Andrew; Diaz, Susana Martinez; Stoddard, Michelina D; Formenti, Silvia; Nagar, Himanshu; Kang, Josephine; Chughtai, Bilal.
Afiliação
  • Alshak MN; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  • Eidelberg A; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  • Diaz SM; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
  • Stoddard MD; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Formenti S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Nagar H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Kang J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Chughtai B; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA. bic9008@med.cornell.edu.
World J Urol ; 40(5): 1143-1150, 2022 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35182206
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for prostate cancer, but has morbidity as both the bladder and rectum are radiated during treatment. Our goal was to document and compare lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among men who underwent SBRT with and without SpaceOAR hydrogel (Augmenix, Inc., Bedford, MA).

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 87 men (50 SpaceOAR and 37 non-SpaceOAR) who underwent SBRT. Primary outcomes were patient reported symptoms during radiation therapy, pharmacotherapy usage, and urologic and bowel survey scores up to 6-months post-SBRT.

RESULTS:

78% of men were on α-inhibitors at the end of SBRT, an increase from 27.6% baseline usage (p < 0.001). Post-SBRT urinary frequency was more common in the non-SpaceOAR group versus the SpaceOAR group (68% versus 38%, p = 0.006), as was nocturia (35% vs. 8%, p = 0.002). Acute gastrointestinal symptoms did not differ. 58.8% of men were on α-inhibitors at 6-months of follow-up post-SBRT, an increase from 27.6% baseline usage (p < 0.001). Importantly, there was a difference of α-inhibitor use between non-SpaceOAR and SpaceOAR groups at the end of SBRT and at 1.5-, 3-, and 6-months follow up (86% vs. 53% [p = 0.002], 83% vs. 53% [p = 0.005], 72% vs. 49% [p = 0.038], respectively).

CONCLUSION:

LUTS after SBRT remains a significant problem for men undergoing treatment for prostate cancer. LUTS affects men during and up to 6-months following SBRT. Owing to these increased LUTS, preemptive minimally invasive solutions and their mechanisms of protection, including the SpaceOAR, should be further investigated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Radiocirurgia / Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Radiocirurgia / Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article