Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Induction of labour: creation of a classification of Grenoble allowing an assessment of the evaluation of practices.
Vanneaux, Manon; Forey, Pierre-Louis; Equy, Véronique; Hoffmann, Pascale; Riethmuller, Didier.
Afiliação
  • Vanneaux M; Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique & Médecine de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA), La Tronche, France. mvanneaux@ch-annecygenevois.fr.
  • Forey PL; Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique & Médecine de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA), La Tronche, France.
  • Equy V; Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique & Médecine de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA), La Tronche, France.
  • Hoffmann P; Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique & Médecine de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA), La Tronche, France.
  • Riethmuller D; Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique & Médecine de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA), La Tronche, France.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 143, 2022 Feb 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35189831
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Induction of labour, a very common obstetric procedure, affects about one in five pregnant women in most developed countries. Induction of labour is medically indicated, is subject to risks and additional costs, and is often poorly experienced by patients. The practices concerning induction vary widely from centre to centre and therefore need to be evaluated. Our aim was to develop a tool for evaluating induction of labour which would facilitate geographical and temporal comparisons.

METHODS:

We have created a classification based on the principles of the internationally known Robson classification. It should be simple, robust, reproducible and require readily available data in each file. The groups are fully inclusive and mutually exclusive. This classification has been validated by a Delphi method.

RESULTS:

Our classification includes 8 clinically relevant groups according to 5 obstetrical criteria. In order to classify each patient into a group, a simple system based on a maximum of 7 successive questions (from 1 to 7 questions) is used. Our classification has been validated by 13 national experts with satisfactory overall approval.

CONCLUSIONS:

With a view to improving the quality of care, our Grenoble classification would allow a standardization of the evaluation of practices of the induction of labour over time in the same maternity hospital. It would also allow the comparison of practices within different maternity hospitals in a network, a country or even different countries.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article