Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Adjunct of Electric Neurostimulation to Rehabilitation Approaches in Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Ahmed, Ishtiaq; Yeldan, Ipek; Mustafaoglu, Rustem.
Afiliação
  • Ahmed I; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Yeldan I; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Mustafaoglu R; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: rustem.mustafaoglu@iuc.edu.tr.
Neuromodulation ; 25(8): 1197-1214, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35216873
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This review analyzed the current evidence and the potential for the application of electric neurostimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using network meta-analysis (NMA), searching the following data bases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using specific keywords, from January 2010 to April 2021, and assessing the effects of "tDCS" or "VNS" combined with other therapies on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke.

RESULTS:

We included 38 RCTs with 1261 participants. Pairwise NMA showed transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) and anodal tDCS were effective in improving upper limb motor function (tVNS mean difference [MD] 5.50; 95% CI [0.67-11.67]; p < 0.05; anodal tDCS MD 5.23; 95% CI [2.45-8.01]; p < 0.05). tVNS and tDCS (anodal and cathodal) were also effective in improving ADL performance after stroke (tVNS standard MD [SMD] 0.96; 95% CI [0.15-2.06]; p < 0.05; anodal tDCS SMD 3.78; 95% CI [0.0-7.56]; p < 0.05; cathodal tDCS SMD 5.38; 95% CI [0.22-10.54]; p < 0.05). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis revealed that tVNS is the best ranked treatment in improving upper limb motor function and performance in ADL after stroke. There was no difference in safety between VNS and its control interventions, measured by reported adverse events (VNS risk ratio = 1.02 [95% CI = 0.48-2.17; I2 = 0; p = 0.96]).

CONCLUSION:

Moderate- to high-quality evidence suggests that tVNS and anodal tDCS were effective in improving upper limb motor function in both acute/subacute and chronic stroke. In addition to tVNS and anodal tDCS, cathodal tDCS is also effective in improving ADL performance after stroke.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article