Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of myasthenia gravis diagnosis in the older Medicare population.
Lee, Ikjae; Schold, Jesse D; Hehir, Michael K; Claytor, Benjamin; Silvestri, Nicholas; Li, Yuebing.
Afiliação
  • Lee I; The Neurological Institute of New York, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Schold JD; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Hehir MK; Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Claytor B; Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Clevelnd Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Silvestri N; Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo/SUNY, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  • Li Y; Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Clevelnd Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Muscle Nerve ; 65(6): 676-682, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218052
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION/

AIMS:

Administrative health data has been increasingly used to study the epidemiology of myasthenia gravis (MG) but a case ascertainment algorithm is lacking. We aimed to develop a valid algorithm for identifying MG patients in the older population with Medicare coverage.

METHODS:

Local older patients (age ≥65) who received healthcare at the Cleveland Clinic and possessed Medicare coverage in 2014 and 2015 were selected. Potential MG patients were identified by using a combination of ICD9 or ICD10 codes for MG and MG-related text-word search. Diagnosis was categorized as "definite MG", "possible MG" or "non-MG" after review of clinical summaries by 5 neuromuscular specialists. Performances of various algorithms were tested by use of the definite MG cohort as a reference standard, and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.

RESULTS:

A total of 118 988 local older patients with Medicare coverage were identified. Usage of MG ICD codes and text-word search resulted in 125 patients with definite and 67 with possible MG. A total of 45 algorithms involving ICD usage, medication prescription, and specialty visit were tested. The best performing algorithm was identified as 2 office visits using MG ICD codes separated by at least 4 weeks or 1 hospital discharge and 1 office visit each using MG ICD codes separated by at least 4 weeks within the two-year period, resulting in a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 80% for identifying definite MG patients.

DISCUSSION:

Algorithms using ICD codes can reliably identify patients with MG with a high degree of accuracy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Miastenia Gravis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Miastenia Gravis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article