Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery still have a role?
Abu-Ain, Mohammad Saleh; Al-Latayfeh, Motasem Mohammad; Khan, Mohammad Irfan.
Afiliação
  • Abu-Ain MS; Prince Hamzah Hospital, Amman, Jordan. abuain@hotmail.co.uk.
  • Al-Latayfeh MM; Department of Special and General Surgery, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan. abuain@hotmail.co.uk.
  • Khan MI; Prince Hamzah Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 22(1): 102, 2022 Mar 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35246091
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Though Limbal Relaxing Incisions (LRI) were used widely to correct pre-existing corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery, they have been replaced recently with the more expensive methods like the use of toric Intra Ocular Lenses (IOL) and femtosecond during cataract surgery. We conducted our study to re-evaluate the role of (LRI) in correcting pre-existing moderate corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery in settings where other options are neither available nor affordable.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive cases of LRI performed by a single surgeon at the time of cataract surgery to correct moderate corneal astigmatism (1.5-3D) in a community hospital over a period of 6 months. Corneal astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were recorded pre-operatively, 4 weeks and 3 months post-operatively. Data on age, intraocular lens (IOL) power, predictive refraction and post-operative spherical equivalent was also collected and analyzed. The number and position of LRI was determined based on the pre-existing corneal astigmatism using online calculator.

RESULTS:

29 eyes of 25 patients with the mean age of 73.6 years (range 46 to 90 years) and corneal astigmatism between 1.5 to 3D were included. Statistically significant reduction in the mean corneal astigmatism was recorded from 2.05 ± 0.45D preoperatively to 0.85 ± 0.56D postoperatively (P < 0.0001). All eyes showed reduction in astigmatism; 83% of eyes had < 1.0D post-operatively and 66% of eyes had < 0.75D. UDVA of 6/9 or better was recorded in 80% of eyes post-operatively (CDVA of 6/9 or better in 100%). The spherical equivalent was within 1.0D of the predictive refraction postoperatively in nearly all eyes (97%) and within 0.5D in 86% of the eyes. There were no peri-operative or post-operative complications were recorded in any case.

CONCLUSION:

Combining LRI and cataract surgery to address moderate degrees of corneal astigmatism is a safe, reliable and predictable option especially in areas where more expensive methods such as toric IOL or excimer laser are not available or affordable. LRI has no significant effect on the spherical equivalent and is an excellent tool in reducing patient's spectacle dependence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Astigmatismo / Catarata / Facoemulsificação / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Astigmatismo / Catarata / Facoemulsificação / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article