Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies - a systematic review.
Richardson, Matt X; Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara; Wamala Andersson, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Richardson MX; School of Health and Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden. matt.richardson@mdu.se.
  • Landerdahl Stridsberg S; School of Health and Welfare and the Institutional Library, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
  • Wamala Andersson S; School of Health and Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 357, 2022 Mar 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35300663
BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this process may be lacking. METHOD: This study investigated the use of evidence as a requirement in public sector tendering process of HWT, and how it affected bidder attributes and procurement outcomes. A novel type of systematic review and content analysis of requests for tenders for HWT announced prior to June 2021 was therefore conducted in Swedish public procurement databases. RESULT: Ninety requests for tenders for 11 types of HWT met the inclusion criteria for review, accounting for potential contracts worth 246 to 296 million EUR. Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness were used in 16 requests for tenders, accounting for 183 million EUR in potential contracts. Eight of the requests referred to an established independent standard to confirm such evidence, such as CE standard of conformity, MDR and/or MDD. This prevalence appears to cut across all types of procuring organisations and all types of HWT. The use of any evidence criteria, or lack thereof, does not appear to affect the outcomes of the tendering process. CONCLUSION: Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness are used in less than a fifth of all public procurements of health- and welfare technologies in Sweden, and less than 10% refer to some form of independent standard as confirmation of such evidence. The procurement process therefore risks creating a legacy of sub-optimal technologies in health- and social care services. More prevalent and specific requirements for evidence and its continual generation in the procurement process are highly recommended. Recommendations for decision makers, procurement managers, and developers are provided.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Setor Público / Contratos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Setor Público / Contratos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article