Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stigma and related influencing factors in postoperative oral cancer patients in China: a cross-sectional study.
Tan, Chuxia; Zhong, Chenxi; Mei, Ranran; Yang, Ronghong; Wang, Dangdang; Deng, Xianjiao; Chen, Shihao; Ye, Man.
Afiliação
  • Tan C; Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
  • Zhong C; Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
  • Mei R; Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
  • Yang R; Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
  • Wang D; Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
  • Deng X; Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
  • Chen S; Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
  • Ye M; Intensive Care Unit of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(6): 5449-5458, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35305161
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To examine the level of stigma and identify its influencing factors among postoperative oral cancer patients in China.

METHODS:

In total, 274 postoperative oral cancer patients were recruited from a Grade A Tertiary Hospital in China using convenience sampling methods. Patients completed the Social Impact Scale (SIS), Medical Coping Mode Questionnaire (MCMQ), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and General Self-efficacy Scale (GSE).

RESULTS:

Stigma reported by postoperative oral cancer patients was moderate (50.17 ± 21.24). Stepped multiple linear regression showed that the related factors influencing their feelings of stigma were educational level (ß = - 0.110, P = 0.001), smoking (ß = - 0.152, P < 0.001), betel quid (ß = - 0.120, P = 0.001), tumor location (ß = - 0.390, P < 0.001), tumor stage (ß = 0.219, P < 0.001), self-efficacy (ß = - 0.253, P < 0.001), and confrontation (ß = - 0.117, P = 0.001) and avoidance (ß = 0.123, P < 0.001), which explained 74.2% of the total variation in stigma (F = 99.378, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Stigma was positively predicted by tumor stage and avoidance but negatively predicted by education level, smoking, betel quid, tumor location, confrontation, and self-efficacy. Further work should focus on developing interventions to reduce stigma by improving protective factors and decreasing risk factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Bucais / Estigma Social Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Bucais / Estigma Social Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article