Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expert Roundtable on Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Rosenfeld, Cheryl; Blevins, Thomas; Aleppo, Grazia; Forlenza, Gregory; Isaacs, Diana; Morales, Javier; Seley, Jane; Unger, Jeffrey.
Afiliação
  • Rosenfeld C; North Jersey Endocrine Consultants, Parsippany, New Jersey. Electronic address: cheryl.rosenfeld@touro.edu.
  • Blevins T; Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology, Austin, Texas.
  • Aleppo G; Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Forlenza G; University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Isaacs D; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Morales J; Advanced Internal Medicine P.C., Greenvale, New York.
  • Seley J; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Unger J; Unger Primary Care Concierge Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Endocr Pract ; 28(6): 622-627, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35364329
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define an expert opinion on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, including its advantages, barriers, and best clinical practices for initiation, patient-clinician communication, and data management. METHODS: A series of virtual discussions was held to recommend improvements to clinical practice and design clinical tools for primary care clinicians. Participants included endocrinologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, advanced practice nurses, and diabetes care and education specialists. RESULTS: The expert panels recommended CGM as a supplement to blood glucose monitoring and hemoglobin A1c for managing diabetes in persons with diabetes (PWDs). CGM can help predict potential pitfalls in glycemic management, including hypo and hyperglycemic excursions, which directly influence lifestyle changes, medication initiation, and dosing decisions. A toolkit was designed with practical guidance on the integration of CGM into clinical practice, interpretation of results, clinical guidelines, a patient action plan, and other useful management tools. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the findings from a roundtable discussion with endocrinology and primary care clinicians, a discussion of the advantages and challenges of CGM, and clinical approaches to improving the care of PWDs. CGM offers more detailed tracking of glucose levels than blood glucose monitoring or hemoglobin A1c, and it can detect asymptomatic hypoglycemia. Specialized education of providers, the cost to patients and providers, and data management are barriers to the widespread adoption of CGM for PWDs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article