Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective Review of Reproductive Outcomes Comparing Vaginal Progesterone to Intramuscular Progesterone as Luteal Support in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles.
White, Justin; Hickey, Joanne; Dufton, Megan; Sandila, Navjot; Ripley, Michael.
Afiliação
  • White J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS. Electronic address: justinwhite@dal.ca.
  • Hickey J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS.
  • Dufton M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Atlantic Assisted Reproductive Therapies, Halifax, NS.
  • Sandila N; Research Methods Unit, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS.
  • Ripley M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Atlantic Assisted Reproductive Therapies, Halifax, NS.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(7): 791-797, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35390519
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Recent literature suggests that progesterone in oil (PIO) is superior to vaginal progesterone (VP; Prometrium) for endometrial preparation in frozen embryo transfer cycles (FET), improving the live birth rate and reducing the rate of miscarriage. PIO has disadvantages including cost, pain, and stress of administration. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether VP is non-inferior to PIO for medicated FET cycles.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for PIO versus VP for medicated FET cycles, from 2017 to 2020 at a single fertility clinic. A total of 745 participants were included in the study; 438 received VP, and 307 received PIO. Univariate and multivariate binary and ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the rates of pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth between VP and PIO.

RESULTS:

Our data demonstrated no difference between PIO and VP with respect to the rates of pregnancy (51% vs. 53%), miscarriage (20% vs. 18%), or live birth (31% vs. 34%) (all P > 0.05). For participants taking PIO, the odds of pregnancy were 0.93 [95% CI (0.70, 1.25), P = 0.65] that of participants on VP.

CONCLUSION:

In our single-centre experience, VP was non-inferior to PIO for endometrial preparation in FET cycles.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Progesterona / Aborto Espontâneo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Progesterona / Aborto Espontâneo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article