Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for the Treatment of Renal Colic in the ED: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Gulacti, Umut; Algin, Abdullah; Turgut, Kasim; Yavuz, Erdal; Aydin, Irfan; Buyukaslan, Hasan; Lok, Ugur; Arslan, Ebru; Gonel, Ataman.
Afiliação
  • Gulacti U; Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey. Electronic address: umutgulacti@gmail.com.
  • Algin A; Department of Emergency Medicine, SBU Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Turgut K; Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey.
  • Yavuz E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey.
  • Aydin I; Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey.
  • Buyukaslan H; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harran University Medical Faculty, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Lok U; Department of Emergency Medicine, Sutcu imam University Medical Faculty, K.Maras, Turkey.
  • Arslan E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman University Medical Faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey.
  • Gonel A; Department of Biochemistry, Medical Park Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Am J Emerg Med ; 56: 127-132, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35397352
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the analgesic efficacy of TENS treatment in patients with renal colic in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS:

This double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care ED. Patients with a definitive diagnosis of renal colic were assigned (11) as randomized to receive the real TENS with frequency 100 Hz, pulse width 200 microseconds, voltage 2 mA, or placebo with sham TENS. Pain intensity was measured using visual analog scales (VAS) at baseline, after 15 and 30th minutes.

RESULTS:

A total of 100 patients were included in the final

analysis:

50 patients treated with real TENS and 50 patients treated with sham TENS. VAS scores in both groups were similar at baseline. The mean reduction in VAS score at 15 min was 33.3 ± 17.6 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 28.3 to 38.3) for the real TENS group and 14.9 ± 11.6 (95% CI 11.6 to 18.2) for the sham TENS group (mean difference 18.4 (95% CI 12.5 to 24.4, P < 0.0001). The mean reduction in VAS score at 30 min was 63.7 ± 21.1 (95% CI 57.7 to 69.7) for the real TENS group and 14.9 ± 16.2 (95% CI 19.5 to 10.3) for the sham TENS group (mean difference 48.8, 95% CI 41.4 to 56.3, P < 0.0001). Four patients (8%) in the real TENS group and 24 patients (48%) in the sham TENS group required the rescue medication after 30th minutes.

CONCLUSIONS:

TENS is effective for acute pain treatment in renal colic patients in the ED. TENS therapy could be a treatment option for renal colic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea / Cólica Renal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea / Cólica Renal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article