Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical use of blood flow restriction in people with neurologic conditions: a cross-sectional survey.
Mañago, Mark M; Kimbrell, Kyle; Hager, Emily R; Dwight, Hannah; Owens, Johnny; Bade, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Mañago MM; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus: Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Kimbrell K; Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA.
  • Hager ER; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, USA.
  • Dwight H; Owens Recovery Science, USA.
  • Owens J; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus: Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Bade M; VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, USA.
J Phys Ther Sci ; 34(4): 275-283, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35400831
ABSTRACT
[Purpose] There is little evidence for blood flow restriction (BFR), or Kaatsu, training in people with neurologic conditions. This study's purpose was to survey clinicians on BFR use in people with neurologic conditions. [Participants and Methods] One-hundred twelve physical therapists and other healthcare professionals who reported using BFR in the past 5 years completed an anonymous, online survey. [Results] Eighty-nine percent of respondents thought BFR was safe in people with neurologic conditions. Meanwhile, 38% reported BFR use in people with neurologic conditions. The most common intervention used with BFR was resistance training (n=33) and the most commonly reported benefit was improved strength (n=27). The most common side-effect causing treatment to stop was intolerance to pressure (n=6). No side-effects requiring medical attention were reported. In order to support future BFR use in neurologic populations, the most common response was the need for more research (n=63). [Conclusion] Despite the lack of evidence, clinical use of BFR in people with neurologic conditions may be somewhat common. Although this study had a relatively small sample size and collected data retrospectively, the results support the potential clinical feasibility and safety of BFR use in patients with neurologic conditions and suggest that more research is needed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article