Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multi-institutional experience of Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MicroPERC) for renal stones: Results and feasibility of day case surgery.
Baboudjian, M; Negre, T; Van Hove, A; McManus, R; Lechevallier, E; Gondran-Tellier, B; Boissier, R.
Afiliação
  • Baboudjian M; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147, Bd Baille, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, AP-HM, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma Univer
  • Negre T; Department of Urology, Hôpital Privé de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
  • Van Hove A; Department of Urology, European Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • McManus R; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147, Bd Baille, Marseille, France.
  • Lechevallier E; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147, Bd Baille, Marseille, France.
  • Gondran-Tellier B; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147, Bd Baille, Marseille, France.
  • Boissier R; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147, Bd Baille, Marseille, France.
Prog Urol ; 32(6): 435-441, 2022 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35431123
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To report the multi-institutional outcomes of Microperc for nephrolithiasis and to assess its feasibility in outpatient care.

METHODS:

We retrospectively identified all adult patients who underwent Microperc for renal stones at three centres between May 2015 and March 2021. Interventions were performed by three Surgeons. One Surgeon adopted a "one-way" strategy and all Microperc were performed on an outpatient basis, while the other two Surgeons provided inpatient monitoring for at least one day after surgery. The primary endpoint was same-day discharge after Microperc without emergency department visits or unplanned readmission within 30 days of the procedure. The secondary endpoints included treatment outcomes and the 30-day complication rate.

RESULTS:

Out of 72 consecutive patients included, 32 patients (44.4%) had same-day discharge. Median Charlson score (1 [0-2]) and cumulative stone size (15 [12-20] mm) were comparable between both groups. At one month post procedure, 32 patients (44.4%) were stone free and 23 patients (32%) had residual micro-fragments<3mm, conferring an overall success rate of 76.4% (inpatient Microperc group 77.5% vs outpatient Microperc group 75%, P=1). Analysis of the 30-day complication rate showed similar results between the two groups (Clavien I-II 18.1%, Clavien≥III 4.1%). After outpatient care, the rate of immediate admission and unplanned readmission was 12.5% (n=4), mainly due to urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSION:

In this multi-institutional study, we report that outpatient Microperc is feasible in selected patients with no significant impact on postoperative outcome.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nefrostomia Percutânea / Cálculos Renais / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nefrostomia Percutânea / Cálculos Renais / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article