Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic evaluation of MRI-targeted, systematic and combined biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis through 10 years of practice in a single institution.
Lenfant, Louis; Renard-Penna, Raphaele; de Rycke, Yann; Rouprêt, Morgan; Beaugerie, Aurelien; Comperat, Eva; Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel; Mozer, Pierre C.
Afiliação
  • Lenfant L; GRC no 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, UrologyParis Cedex 13, France.
  • Renard-Penna R; GRC no 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, UrologyParis Cedex 13, France.
  • de Rycke Y; Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Rouprêt M; Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
  • Beaugerie A; GRC no 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, UrologyParis Cedex 13, France.
  • Comperat E; GRC no 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, UrologyParis Cedex 13, France.
  • Chartier-Kastler E; GRC no 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, UrologyParis Cedex 13, France.
  • Mozer PC; Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
World J Urol ; 40(7): 1661-1668, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35482073
PURPOSE: To perform a dynamic evaluation of the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate according to the biopsy strategy over 10 years of practice in a single institution that pioneered MRI-targeted fusion biopsy (MRI-TB). METHODS: This stage 4 IDEAL study prospectively included all consecutive patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy for clinically suspected PCa between January 2010 and November 2020. Patients with positive MRI (PIRADS score ≥ 3) underwent both MRI-TB and systematic biopsy (SB) while those with negative MRI (PIRADS score < 3) underwent SB only. The main outcome was the evolution of the detection rate of clinically relevant PCa (csPCa; grade ≥ 2). The secondary outcome was the change in PCa detection rate according to the biopsy method. RESULTS: A total of 2942 men underwent prostate MRI and a prostate biopsy: 2322 underwent MRI-TB and 620 had SB only. The detection rate of csPCa increased 2.5-fold from 23 to 58%. The detection rate of PCa and csPCa was significantly higher in patients who underwent MRI-TB compared to those who underwent SB only (67% vs. 52% and 40% vs. 32%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both comparisons)). The number of csPCa diagnosed by MRI-TB increased linearly over the study period and represented the majority of PCa diagnoses after 2016. CONCLUSION: Implementation of MRI-TB in patients with positive MRI led to improved detection of csPCa.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article