Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinician Estimates of Frailty Compared to Formal Frailty Assessment in Adults With Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
McDonagh, Julee; Prichard, Roslyn; Ferguson, Caleb; Phillips, Jane L; Davidson, Patricia M; Macdonald, Peter S; Newton, Phillip J.
Afiliação
  • McDonagh J; College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing/School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Gosford, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: Julee.McDonagh@newcastle.edu.au.
  • Prichard R; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
  • Ferguson C; School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; Blacktown Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Phillips JL; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
  • Davidson PM; University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  • Macdonald PS; St Vincent's Hospital Heart and Lung Clinic, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Newton PJ; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ ; 31(9): 1241-1246, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35501244
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Frailty assessment is recommended for patients with heart failure. Despite the availability of instruments to assess frailty, there are no clear recommendations regarding the optimal instrument to use in a heart failure context. This ambiguity combined with a lack of education and resources, often leads clinicians to rely on subjective estimates of frailty, such as 'the end-of-the-bed' or 'eyeball' test.

AIM:

To examine the association between clinician-estimated frailty and formal frailty assessment in adults with heart failure.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional analysis of the FRAilty MEasurement in Heart Failure (FRAME-HF) study.

PARTICIPANTS:

(1) Adults aged ≥18 years in the outpatient heart failure clinic and cardiology ward; (2) and cardiovascular clinicians (nurses, physicians, and allied-health professionals). Following participant recruitment, cardiovascular clinicians were asked to rate the participant's frailty status based on their routine clinical assessment as either frail, pre-frail, or non-frail, which was then compared to a formal frailty assessment using a modified version of the Frailty Phenotype. The association between clinician-estimated frailty and formal frailty assessment were examined using a weighted Kappa statistic and Spearman's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS:

A total of 75 patients and 39 clinicians were recruited, producing 194 paired frailty assessments. Mean age of the patients was 54 (±13) years. Correlation of pooled clinician-estimated frailty to formal frailty was fair (0.52, p=0.00). Correlation was highest between allied-health estimated frailty and formal frailty (0.70, p=0.00). Agreement between pooled clinician-estimated frailty and formal frailty was fair (0.33) and was highest between allied health-estimated frailty and formal frailty (0.45).

CONCLUSION:

Subjective clinician-estimated frailty is not a reliable replacement for formal frailty assessment in adults with heart failure, underscoring the need for assessment using a valid and reliable instrument.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article