Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mitigating analyte to stable isotope labelled internal standard cross-signal contribution in quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Radovanovic, Mirjana; Jones, Graham; Day, Richard O; Galettis, Peter; Norris, Ross L G.
Afiliação
  • Radovanovic M; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Jones G; SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Day RO; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Galettis P; SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Norris RLG; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab ; 24: 57-64, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35520954
ABSTRACT

Background:

Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.

Methods:

Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (m/z 454 â†’ 160 â†’ 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (m/z 458 â†’ 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and m/z 460 â†’ 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.

Results:

When using the SIL-IS isotope m/z 458 â†’ 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, m/z 460 â†’ 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.

Conclusions:

Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article