Real Life Outcomes of Infrapopliteal Endovascular and Surgical Bypass Intervention for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in GLASS Stages II and III.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Great efforts have been made to choose between bypass surgery and angioplasty as the first choice for revascularisation in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Endovascular therapy predominates despite limited evidence for its advantages. The purpose of this observational cohort study was to investigate outcomes after open and endovascular infrapopliteal revascularisation in extensive infrainguinal arterial disease. METHODS: The medical records of 1 427 patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularisation exclusively for CLTI in the period January 2014 to February 2019 were reviewed. After detailed analysis, only infrapopliteal revascularisations classified as GLASS stage II or III were considered, resulting in 326 procedures. In total, 127 patients underwent endovascular therapy and 199 patients underwent bypass graft surgery (BGS). The primary endpoints included amputation free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the analyses of multiple factors related to long term AFS. RESULTS: Regarding the primary endpoint, AFS was 75.2% and 65.2% at one and three years, respectively. OS at one and three years was 91.2% and 83.1%, respectively. In the univariable analysis, the hazard of the combined endpoint of major amputation or death was higher after bypass surgery than after endovascular therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 - 2.89; p = .013). After either revascularisation method, TASC II femoropopliteal D was associated with a higher risk of amputation or death (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.10 - 2.58; p = .015). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed no association between the variables analysed for AFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with CLTI submitted to infrapopliteal revascularisation and classified as GLASS II and III had satisfactory AFS and OS rates after an individualised team conference decision. Furthermore, the revascularisation modality (endovascular or open) did not influence the AFS results.