Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decision-making approaches for children with life-limiting conditions: results from a qualitative phenomenological study.
Vemuri, Sidharth; Hynson, Jenny; Williams, Katrina; Gillam, Lynn.
Afiliação
  • Vemuri S; Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. sid.vemuri2@rch.org.au.
  • Hynson J; Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hopsital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
  • Williams K; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
  • Gillam L; Children's Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
BMC Med Ethics ; 23(1): 52, 2022 05 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35578235
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For children with life-limiting conditions who are unable to participate in decision-making, decisions are made for them by their parents and paediatricians. Shared decision-making is widely recommended in paediatric clinical care, with parents preferring a collaborative approach in the care of their child. Despite the increasing emphasis to adopt this approach, little is known about the roles and responsibilities taken by parents and paediatricians in this process. In this study, we describe how paediatricians approach decision-making for a child with a life-limiting condition who is unable to participate in decision-making for his/herself.

METHODS:

This qualitative phenomenological study involved 25 purposively sampled paediatricians. Verbatim transcripts from individual semi-structured interviews, conducted between mid-2019 and mid-2020, underwent thematic analysis. Interviews were based around a case vignette matched to the clinical experience of each paediatrician.

RESULTS:

Two key themes were identified in the exploration of paediatricians' approach to decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions (1) there is a spectrum of paediatricians' roles and responsibilities in decision-making, and (2) the specific influences on paediatricians' choice of approach for end-of-life decisions. In relation to (1), analysis showed four distinct approaches (i) non-directed, (ii) joint, (iii) interpretative, and (iv) directed. In relation to (2), the common factors were (i) harm to the child, (ii) possible psychological harm to parents, (iii) parental preferences in decision-making, and (iv) resource allocation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite self-reporting shared decision-making practices, what paediatricians often described were physician-led decision-making approaches. Adopting these approaches was predominantly justified by paediatricians' considerations of harm to the child and parents. Further research is needed to elucidate the issues identified in this study, particularly the communication within and parental responses to physician-led approaches. We also need to further study how parental needs are identified in family-led decision-making approaches. These nuances and complexities are needed for future practice guidance and training around paediatric decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Relações Profissional-Família Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Relações Profissional-Família Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article