Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of urgent and early endoscopy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients.
Güven, Ibrahim Ethem; Baspinar, Batuhan; Durak, Muhammed Bahaddin; Yüksel, Ilhami.
Afiliação
  • Güven IE; Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent Avenue, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Baspinar B; Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent Avenue, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: batuhanbaspinar@gmail.com.
  • Durak MB; Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent Avenue, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yüksel I; Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent Avenue, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University School of Medicine, Bilkent Avenue, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 46(3): 178-184, 2023 Mar.
Article em En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35605821
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Data regarding early (within 24h) and urgent endoscopy (within 12h) in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NV-UGIB) revealed conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the impact of endoscopy timing on the outcomes of high-risk patients with NV-UGIB. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

From February 2020 to February 2021, consecutive high-risk (Glasgow-Blatchford score ≥12) adults admitted to the emergency department with NV-UGIB were analyzed retrospectively. The primary composite outcome was 30-day mortality from any cause, inpatient rebleeding, need for endoscopic re-intervention, need for surgery or angiographic embolization.

RESULTS:

240 patients were enrolled 152 (63%) patients underwent urgent endoscopy (<12h) and 88 (37%) patients underwent early endoscopy (12-24h). One or more components of the composite outcome were observed in 53 (22.1%) patients 30 (12.5%) had 30-day mortality, rebleeding occurred in 27 (11.3%), 7 (2.9%) underwent endoscopic re-intervention, and 5 (2.1%) required surgery or angiographic embolization. The composite outcome was similar between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed only hemodynamic instability on admission (OR 3.05, p=0.006), and the previous history of cancer (OR 2.42, p=0.029) were significant in predicting composite outcome. In terms of secondary outcomes, the endoscopic intervention was higher in the urgent endoscopy group (p=0.006), whereas the number of transfused erythrocyte suspensions and the length of hospital stay was higher in the early endoscopy group (p=0.002 and p=0.040, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Urgent endoscopy leads to a significant reduction in the length of hospitalization and the number of transfused erythrocyte suspensions in NV-UGIB, which can contribute to patient satisfaction, reduce healthcare expenditure, and improve hospital bed availability. The composite outcome and its sub-outcomes were the same among both groups.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endoscopia Gastrointestinal / Hemorragia Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En / Es Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endoscopia Gastrointestinal / Hemorragia Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En / Es Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article