Systemic inflammation May limit the effect of protein supplement on nutritional status in peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and inflammation are highly prevalent and associated with poor outcomes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Nutritional supplements are commonly used; however, presence of systemic inflammation could limit their effect. AIM: To evaluate the impact of systemic inflammation on nutritional status of CAPD patients receiving an oral protein supplement. METHODS: Prospective observational study; 34 malnourished patients (subjective global assessment; SGA) received both nutritional counseling and oral egg albumin-based protein supplement. During 6-month of follow-up, patients had monthly clinical, and quarterly biochemical and inflammation [interleukin 6 and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)] evaluations. According to baseline hsCRP, patients were classified in two groups: Inflammation (>3 mg/L) and No-inflammation (≤3 mg/L). RESULTS: Comparing baseline vs final, macronutrient intake and SGA increased in both groups, however, improvement of SGA was more marked in the No-inflammation group at the end of the study: 70% improved, 25% no change and 5% worsened (p = 0.001); whereas in the Inflammation group results were: 50% improved, 36% no change and 14% worsened (p = 0.03). Additionally, at final evaluation, serum albumin tended to increase more in the No-inflammation (3.0 ± 0.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.1 g/dL, p = 0.08) than in Inflammation group (2.8 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 0.9 g/dL, p = 0.66), and body mass index significantly increased in No-inflammation group (20.3 ± 3.0 vs 21.6 ± 3.3 kg/m2, p < 0.001) but not in Inflammation group (21.9 ± 3.0 vs 22.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of systemic inflammation in malnourished CAPD patients seemed to limit the trend for improvement on nutritional status observed with counseling and oral egg albumin-based protein supplement in patients without inflammation.