Single cell versus single nucleus: transcriptome differences in the murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury.

ABSTRACT

The kidney is a complex organ, which consists of multiple components with highly diverse cell types. A detailed understanding of these cell types in health and disease is crucial for the future development of preventive and curative treatment strategies. In recent years, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) technology has opened up completely new possibilities in investigating the variety of renal cell populations in physiological and pathological states. Here, we systematically assessed differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq approaches in transcriptome analysis of murine kidneys after ischemia-reperfusion injury. We included tissues from control kidneys and from kidneys harvested 1 wk after mild (17-min clamping time) and severe (27-min clamping time) transient unilateral ischemia. Our findings revealed important methodological differences in the discovery of inflammatory cells, tubular cells, and other specialized cell types. Although the scRNAseq approach was advantageous for investigating immune cells, the snRNAseq approach allowed superior insights into healthy and damaged tubular cells. Apart from differences in the quantitative discovery rate, we found important qualitative discrepancies in the captured transcriptomes with crucial consequences for the interpretation of cell states and molecular functions. Together, we provide an overview of method-dependent differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq results from identical postischemic kidney tissues. Our results highlight the importance of choosing the right approach for specific research questions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing technologies provide powerful new tools to examine complex tissues such as the kidney. This research reference paper provides practical information on the differences between the two technologies when examining murine kidneys after ischemia-reperfusion injury. The results will serve those who are debating which protocols to use in their given study.