Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determination of accurate baseline representation for three Central Iowa watersheds within a HAWQS-based SWAT analyses.
Brighenti, Tássia Mattos; Gassman, Philip W; Schilling, Keith E; Srinivasan, Raghavan; Liebman, Matt; Thompson, Jan R.
Afiliação
  • Brighenti TM; Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States. Electronic address: tassiab@iastate.edu.
  • Gassman PW; Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States. Electronic address: pwgassma@iastate.edu.
  • Schilling KE; Iowa Geological Survey, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States. Electronic address: keith-schilling@uiowa.edu.
  • Srinivasan R; Departments of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States. Electronic address: r-srinivasan@tamu.edu.
  • Liebman M; Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States. Electronic address: mliebman@iastate.edu.
  • Thompson JR; Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States. Electronic address: jrrt@iastate.edu.
Sci Total Environ ; 839: 156302, 2022 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35640760
ABSTRACT
Improving food systems to address food insecurity and minimize environmental impacts is still a challenge in the 21st century. Ecohydrological models are a key tool for accurate system representation and impact measurement. We used a multi-phase testing approach to represent baseline hydrologic conditions across three agricultural basins that drain parts of north central and central Iowa, U.S. the Des Moines River Basin (DMRB), the South Skunk River Basin (SSRB), and the North Skunk River Basin (NSRB). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) ecohydrological model was applied using a framework consisting of the Hydrologic and Water Quality System (HAWQS) online platform, 40 streamflow gauges, the alternative runoff curve number method, additional tile drainage and fertilizer application. In addition, ten SWAT baselines were created to analyze both the HAWQS parameters (baseline 1) and nine alternative baseline configurations (considering the framework). Most of the models achieved acceptable statistical replication of measured (close to the outlet) streamflows, with Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) values ranging up to 0.80 for baseline 9 in the DMRB and SSRB, and 0.78 for baseline 7 in the NSRB. However, water balance and other hydrologic indicators revealed that careful selection of management data and other inputs are essential for obtaining the most accurate representation of baseline conditions for the simulated stream systems. Using cumulative distribution curves as a criterion, baselines 7 to 10 showed the best fit for the SSRB and NSRB, but none of the baselines accurately represented 20% of low flows for the DMRB. Analysis of snowmelt and growing season periods showed that baselines 3 and 4 resulted in poor simulations across all three basins using four common statistical measures (NS, KGE, Pbias, and R2), and that baseline 9 was characterized by the most satisfactory statistical results, followed by baselines 5, 7 and 1.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Solo / Qualidade da Água Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Solo / Qualidade da Água Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article