Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in Psychological Determinants of Behavior Change after Individual versus Group-Based Lifestyle-integrated Fall Prevention: Results from the LiFE-is-LiFE Trial.
Labudek, Sarah; Fleig, Lena; Jansen, Carl-Philipp; Kramer-Gmeiner, Franziska; Nerz, Corinna; Clemson, Lindy; Klenk, Jochen; Becker, Clemens; Schwenk, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Labudek S; Network Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Fleig L; Department of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Jansen CP; Department of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Kramer-Gmeiner F; Network Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Nerz C; Department of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Clemson L; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Klenk J; Department of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Becker C; Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Schwenk M; IB University of Health and Social Sciences, Study Centre Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Gerontology ; 69(2): 212-226, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35691288
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) intervention has been shown to promote physical activity in fall-prone older adults. However, the underlying mechanisms of how LiFE functions remain unclear. This study compares the effects of the individual and group-based LiFE formats on psychological determinants of behavior change derived from the health action process approach, habit formation theory, and self-determination theory.

METHODS:

Secondary analysis on basis of the randomized, non-inferiority LiFE-is-LiFE trial were performed. Questionnaire data on psychological determinants were obtained from older adults (M = 78.8 years, range 70-95) who took part in either the individual (n = 156) or the group-based (n = 153) LiFE intervention. Measurement points varied from three to six times, and from baseline (T1) up to a 12-month follow-up (T6). A generalized linear mixed model was specified for each determinant.

RESULTS:

Both LiFE and gLiFE participants reported lower levels of motivational determinants at T6. LiFE participants showed significantly higher values of action planning and coping planning at T6. Participants in both formats showed increased levels of action control at T6, whereas participants' habit strength decreased post-intervention but then stabilized over time. LiFE participants showed higher levels of autonomy, competence, and relatedness throughout the study, but levels of intrinsic motivation did not differ between formats and from T1 to T6.

CONCLUSION:

In both formats, but especially in the individual LiFE, the behavior change techniques used affected volitional rather than motivational or general determinants of behavior change. Habit strength as an important indicator of the sustainability of the LiFE exercises stabilized over time, indicating that participants, at least partly, sustained their formed habits long-term.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article