Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repositioning of the bone window in lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement: A retrospective radiographic study.
Wang, Zhikang; Zhang, Jing; Ren, Lingfei; Yang, Guoli.
Afiliação
  • Wang Z; The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Zhang J; Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Ren L; The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Yang G; Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 33(8): 816-833, 2022 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35713366
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate whether repositioning the bone window leads to a better outcome of three-dimensional sinus augmentation in lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) with simultaneous implant placement. METHODS: 34 patients with a total of 40 implants (14: test group, 26: control group) receiving LSFE with simultaneous implant placement were included in this retrospective research. CBCT images were taken before surgery, immediately and 6 months after surgery. The two-dimensional augmentation parameters, including apical bone height (ABH), endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), and palatal/buccal bone height (PBH/BBH), and three-dimensional parameters, including augmentation volume (AV) and palatal/buccal augmentation volume (PAV/BAV), were measured. The lateral defect length (LDL) and lateral window length (LWL) were also measured to evaluate the lateral antrostomy recovery. RESULTS: At the 6-month follow-up, the reduction rates at ABH, ESBG, and BBH of the test group (ABH: 10.41% ± 30.30%, ESBG: 2.55% ± 8.91%, BBH: 2.50% ± 8.65%) were significantly lower than those of the control group (ABH: 25.10% ± 22.02%, ESBG: 11.47% ± 9.79%, BBH: 7.10% ± 5.37%; p < .05). In addition, the test group showed better three-dimensional augmentation stability on the buccal side (BAV reduction: 15.51% ± 10.86% vs. 27.15% ± 12.61%; p < .05). Moreover, the LDL/LWL ratio of the test group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, repositioning of the bone window in LSFE with simultaneous implant placement could contribute to endo-sinus augmentation stability on the buccal side at the 6-month follow-up. Moreover, it would also facilitate recovery of the lateral antrostomy defect.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Seios Transversos / Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar / Seio Maxilar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Seios Transversos / Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar / Seio Maxilar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article