Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving Knowledge of Active Safety and QI Projects Amongst Practitioners in a Pediatric ICU.
Flaherty, Brian F; Hummel, Kevin; Vijayarajah, Senthuran; White, Benjamin R; Outsen, Shad; Larsen, Gitte Y.
Afiliação
  • Flaherty BF; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Hummel K; Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Vijayarajah S; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Ok.
  • White BR; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA.
  • Outsen S; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Larsen GY; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 7(3): e569, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35720872
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The success of quality improvement (QI) projects depends on many factors, with communication and knowledge of project-specific practice change being fundamental. This project aimed to improve the knowledge of active safety and QI projects.

Methods:

Two interventions were trialed to improve knowledge paired email and meeting announcements followed by a daily huddle to review ongoing projects. Knowledge, measured as the ability to recall a project and its practice change, was the primary outcome. The frequency and duration of the Huddle were process and balancing measures, respectively.

Results:

Seven days after a meeting/email announcement, 3 of 13 (23%) faculty and fellows recalled the announced practice change. Investigators then tested the effects of the Huddle by assessing practitioners' knowledge of safety and QI project-related practice changes on the first and last day of a service week. The average percentage of items recalled increased from the beginning to end of a service week by 33% [46% to 79%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12-53] for faculty and 27% (51% to 77%, 95% CI 13-40) for fellows. The Huddle occurred in four of seven (interquartile range 2-5) days/wk with a mean duration of 4.5 (SD 2) minutes. Follow-up assessment 2 years after Huddle implementation demonstrate sustained increase in item recall [faculty +36% (95% CI +13% to 40%); fellows +35% (95% CI +23% to 47%)].

Conclusions:

A daily huddle to discuss safety and QI project-related practice change is an effective and time-efficient communication method to increase knowledge of active projects.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article