Impact of spill-in counts from off-target regions on [18F]Flortaucipir PET quantification.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) PET quantification is usually hindered by spill-in counts from off-target binding (OFF) regions. The present work aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the impact of OFF in FTP PET quantification, as well as to identify optimal partial volume correction (PVC) strategies to minimize this problem. METHODS: 309 amyloid-beta (Aß) negative cognitively normal subjects were included in the study. Additionally, 510 realistic FTP images with different levels of OFF were generated using Monte Carlo simulation (MC). Images were corrected for PVC using both a simple two-compartment and a multi-region method including OFF regions. FTP standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was quantified in Braak Areas (BA), the hippocampus (which was not included in Braak I/II) and different OFF regions (caudate, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, choroid plexus (ChPlex), cerebellar white matter (cerebWM), hemispheric white matter (hemisWM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) using the lower portion of the cerebellum as a reference region. The correlations between OFF and cortical SUVRs were studied both in real and in simulated PET images, with and without PVC. RESULTS: In-vivo, we found correlations between all OFF and target regions, especially strong for the hemisWM (slope>0.63, R2>0.4). All the correlations were attenuated but remained significant after applying PVC, except for the ChPlex. In MC simulations, the hemisWM and CSF were the main contributors to PVE in all BA (slopes 0.15-0.26 and 0.13-0.21 respectively). The hemisWM (slope=0.2), as well as the ChPlex (slope=0.02), influenced SUVRs in the hippocampus. The CerebWM was negatively correlated with all target regions (slope<-0.02, R2>0.8). While no other correlations between OFF and target regions were found, hemisWM was correlated with all OFF regions but the cerebWM (slopes 0.06-0.33). HemisWM correlations attenuated (slopes<0.06) when applying two-compartment PVC, but the hippocampus-ChPlex and the cerebWM correlations required more complex PVC with dedicated compartments for these regions. In-vivo, PVC removed a notably higher fraction of the correlation between OFF regions found to be affected by PVE in the simulation studies and BA (≈50%) than for OFF regions not affected by PVE (16%). CONCLUSION: HemisWM is the main driver of spill-in effects in FTP PET, affecting both target regions and the rest of OFF regions. PVC successfully reduces PVE, even when using a simple two-compartment method. Despite PVC, non-zero correlations were still observed between target and OFF regions in vivo, which suggests the existence of biological or tracer-related contributions to these correlations.