Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Management, and Outcome of Benign Intraosseous Maxillary Tumors in Adolescents: A Prospective Study.
Hassanein, Ahmed Gaber; Kukreja, Pankaj; Hassanein, Kamal A M; Mansour, Omar Mohammed; Amer, Islam A; Ftohy, Tarek Elsayed.
Afiliação
  • Hassanein AG; Maxillofacial Head & Neck Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
  • Kukreja P; Department of Dental and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hassanein KAM; Department of Dental and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Mansour OM; Maxillofacial Head & Neck Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
  • Amer IA; oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Elramad Hospital, Elbeheira, Ministry of Health, Damanhour, Egypt.
  • Ftohy TE; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(6): e620-e626, 2022 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762625
INTRODUCTION: Benign intraosseous maxillary tumors, although uncommon among the adolescents, represent a major challenge to the maxillofacial surgeons. Treatment ranges from conservative surgery to radical resection and reconstruction. Maxillary defect reconstruction in adolescents is uncommon. it can be achieved by prosthetic obturators, local and regional flaps, and free-tissue transfer. AIM OF THE WORK: To investigate the clinical and pathological patterns, treatment, and outcome of benign intraosseous maxillary tumors in adolescents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 10-years prospective study included patients between 12-18 years who presented with benign intraosseous maxillary tumors and surgically treated (conservative surgery or radical resection) with immediate reconstruction. Cases were followed up to assess functional and aesthetic outcomes and detect complications. RESULTS: Study included 38 patients; 63.2% had non-odontogenic tumors and 36.8% had odontogenic tumors. The most common non-odontogenic tumor was central giant cell granuloma (31.6%). The most common odontogenic tumors were adenomatoid odontogenic tumor and ameloblastoma (10.5% each). Treatment included Conservative surgery (55.3%) and radical resection (44.7%). Reconstruction was performed in 17 cases by temporalis muscle flap (9.83%), obturator (2.46%), and free fibula flap (1.64%). All cases gained accepted functional and esthetic results. CONCLUSIONS: Non-odontogenic tumors were more common than odontogenic tumors. Central giant cell granulomas and ossifying fibromas were the most common non-odontogenic tumors. Ade-nomatoid odontogenic tumor and ameloblastoma were the most common odontogenic tumors. Maxillary reconstructions with tem-poralis muscle flap and obturator were simple and satisfactory. Microsurgical reconstruction had high success rates. Aesthetic, and functional results were satisfactory when appropriate reconstruction was performed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles / Ameloblastoma / Granuloma de Células Gigantes / Neoplasias Maxilares / Tumores Odontogênicos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles / Ameloblastoma / Granuloma de Células Gigantes / Neoplasias Maxilares / Tumores Odontogênicos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article