Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study.
Nakamura, Akihiro; Kagaya, Yuta; Saito, Hiroki; Kanazawa, Masanori; Sato, Kenjiro; Miura, Masanobu; Kondo, Masateru; Endo, Hideaki.
Afiliação
  • Nakamura A; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Kagaya Y; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Saito H; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Kanazawa M; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Sato K; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Miura M; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Kondo M; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
  • Endo H; Department of Cardiology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital.
J Atheroscler Thromb ; 30(5): 443-454, 2023 05 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768226
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist.

METHODS:

In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels.

RESULTS:

The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (-46.1% vs. -34.7%, p<0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%, p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%, p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly higher in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (14/60 vs. 3/60, p =0.004) [corrected].

CONCLUSION:

Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bezafibrato / Hipertrigliceridemia / Apolipoproteína A-I / HDL-Colesterol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bezafibrato / Hipertrigliceridemia / Apolipoproteína A-I / HDL-Colesterol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article