Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study.
Lorenc, Ava; Greaves, Colin; Duda, Joan; Brett, Jo; Matheson, Lauren; Fulton-Lieuw, Tessa; Secher, Denis; Rhodes, Pat; Ozakinci, Gozde; Nankivell, Paul; Mehanna, Hisham; Jepson, Marcus.
Afiliação
  • Lorenc A; QuinteT Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Greaves C; School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Duda J; School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Brett J; Supportive Cancer Care Research Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
  • Matheson L; Supportive Cancer Care Research Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
  • Fulton-Lieuw T; Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Secher D; Patient representatives.
  • Rhodes P; Patient representatives.
  • Ozakinci G; Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Nankivell P; Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Mehanna H; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Jepson M; Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(6): e13641, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35789510
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this work was to explore head and neck cancer (HNC) patients' and their family members' views on acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), including concerns and anticipated benefits.

METHODS:

Patients were recruited from UK HNC clinics, support groups and advocacy groups. They completed a survey (n = 144) and/or qualitative interview (n = 30), three with a family member. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, quantitative data using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS:

Preference for follow-up care in HNC was complex and individual. Many patients thought PIFU could beneficially reallocate health care resources and encourage self-management. Patients' main concerns with PIFU were losing the reassurance of regular clinic appointments and addressing mental well-being needs within PIFU, possibly using peer support. Patients were concerned about their ability to detect recurrence due to lack of expertise and information. They emphasised the importance of a reliable, direct and easy urgent appointment service and of feeling supported and heard by clinicians. Patients believed family and friends need support.

CONCLUSION:

PIFU may be feasible and acceptable for certain HNC patients, providing it addresses support for mental well-being, provides quick, reliable and direct clinician access and information on "red flag" symptoms, and ensures patients and their caregivers feel supported.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autogestão / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autogestão / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article