Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Momentary Partner Involvement in Diabetes Self-Care and Continuously Measured Glucose: A Dynamic Analysis.
Soriano, Emily C; Lenhard, M James; Gonzalez, Jeffrey S; Tennen, Howard; Otto, Amy K; Perndorfer, Christine; Shen, Biing-Jiun; Siegel, Scott D; Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe.
Afiliação
  • Soriano EC; From the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences (Soriano, Otto, Perndorfer, Laurenceau), University of Delaware; Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism (Lenhard, Siegel, Laurenceau), Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware; Department of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Population Health (Gonzalez), Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology & Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, New York City, New York; Departments of Community Medicine and Psychiatry (Tennen), Un
Psychosom Med ; 84(7): 808-812, 2022 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35792706
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the dynamic, real-time associations between partner involvement in diabetes self-care and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) metrics in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: For 1 week, 63 participants wore Dexcom G4 CGMs and provided momentary reports of partner involvement in diabetes self-care five times per day. Dynamic structural equation models were used to estimate the reciprocal lagged effects of partner involvement on next-hour CGM metrics (and vice versa). RESULTS: Partner involvement predicted improved next-hour glucose control for five of six CGM metrics in analyses adjusted for time-varying covariates. The hour after partner involvement, the model predicted a 26.34 mg/dl decrease in glucose level (standardized ß = -0.19), 30% greater odds of meeting target time in target range ( ß = 0.07), 48% higher odds of target time below target range (TBR; ß = 0.04; the only nonsignificant effect), 47% greater odds of target time above target range (ß = 0.11), a 4.20 unit decrease in glucose standard deviation ( ß = -0.19), and a 0.01 unit decrease in glucose coefficient of variation ( ß = -0.08; all p values < .05). There was less consistent support for the reverse pathway, with only two metrics significantly related to next-hour partner involvement: glucose level ( ß = 0.15) and TBR ( ß = 0.21), such that having higher levels and meeting target TBR were significantly predictive of next-hour partner involvement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that partner involvement in daily diabetes management predicts short-term glucose control. More research is needed to understand how partners influence glycemic control and evaluate interventions that promote their involvement in diabetes care.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article