Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in marginal lung allograft survival: Advanced-age donors improve.
Miggins, John James; Reul, Ross Michael; Loor, Gabriel; Ferreira, Liam D; Garcha, Puneet S; Goss, John A; Rana, Abbas A.
Afiliação
  • Miggins JJ; Office of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Reul RM; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Loor G; Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Ferreira LD; Office of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Garcha PS; Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Goss JA; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Rana AA; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 36(9): e14777, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35822915
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Although lung demand continues to outpace supply, 75% of potential donor lungs are discarded without being transplanted in the United States. To identify the discarded cohorts best suited to alleviate the lung shortage and reduce waitlist mortality, we explored changes in survival over time for five marginal donor definitions age >60 years, smoking history >20 pack-years, PaO2 /FiO2  < 300 mmHg, purulent bronchoscopic secretions, and chest radiograph infiltrates.

METHODS:

Our retrospective cohort study separated 27 803 lung recipients in the UNOS Database into three 5-year eras by transplant date 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test were used to compare survival across the eras.

RESULTS:

Three definitions-low PaO2 /FiO2 , purulent bronchoscopic secretions, and abnormal chest radiographs-did not bear out as truly marginal, demonstrating lack of significantly elevated risk. Advanced donor age demonstrated considerable survival improvement (HR (95% CI) 1.47 (1.26-1.72) in 2005-2009 down to 1.14 (.97-1.35) for 2015-2019), with protective factors being recipients <60 years, moderate recipient BMI, and low Lung Allocation Score (LAS). Donors with smoking history failed to demonstrate any significant improvement (HR (95% CI) 1.09 (1.01-1.17) in 2005-2009 increasing to 1.22 (1.08-1.38) in 2015-2019).

CONCLUSIONS:

Advanced donor age, previously the most significant risk factor, has improved to near-benchmark levels, demonstrating the possibility for matching older donors to healthier non-elderly recipients in selected circumstances. Low PaO2 /FiO2 , bronchoscopic secretions, and abnormal radiographs demonstrated survival on par with standard donors. Significant donor smoking history, a moderate risk factor, has failed to improve.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article