Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prehospital care for ovarian cancer in Catalonia: could we do better in primary care? Retrospective cohort study.
Vela-Vallespín, Carmen; Manchon-Walsh, Paula; Aliste, Luisa; Borras, Josep M; Marzo-Castillejo, Mercè.
Afiliação
  • Vela-Vallespín C; Primary Health Care Center Riu Nord i Riu Sud, Catalan Institute of Health, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain.
  • Manchon-Walsh P; Research Support Unit Metropolitana Nord, University Institute for Primary Health Care Research (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Catalan Health Institut, Mataró, Spain.
  • Aliste L; Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
  • Borras JM; Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
  • Marzo-Castillejo M; Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
BMJ Open ; 12(7): e060499, 2022 07 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35868821
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of prehospital factors (diagnostic pathways, first presentation to healthcare services, intervals, participation in primary care) on 1-year and 5-year survival in people with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

DESIGN:

Retrospective quasi-population-based cohort study.

SETTING:

Catalan Integrated Public Healthcare System.

PARTICIPANTS:

People with EOC who underwent surgery with a curative intent in public Catalan hospitals between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Data from primary and secondary care clinical histories and care processes in the 18 months leading up to confirmation (signs and symptoms at presentation, diagnosis pathways, referrals, diagnosis interval) of the EOC diagnosis (stage, histology type, treatment). Diagnostic process intervals were based on the Aarhus statement. 1-year and 5-year survival analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS:

Of the 513 patients included in the cohort, 67.2% initially consulted their family physician, while 36.4% were diagnosed through emergency services. In the Cox models, survival was influenced by advanced stage at 1 year (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.23 to 12.02) and 5 years (HR 5.36, 95% CI 3.07 to 9.36), as was the type of treatment received, although this association was attenuated over follow-up. Age became significant at 5 years of follow-up. After adjusting for age, adjusted morbidity groups, stage at diagnosis and treatment, 5-year survival was better in patients presenting with gynaecological bleeding (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79). Survival was not associated with a starting point involving primary care (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.09), diagnostic pathways involving referral to elective gynaecological care from non-general practitioners (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26), or self-presentation to emergency services (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.31).

CONCLUSIONS:

Survival in EOC is not associated with diagnostic pathways or prehospital healthcare, but it is influenced by stage at diagnosis, administration of primary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy and patient age.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article