Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between the atherogenic index of plasma and major adverse cardiovascular events among non-diabetic hypertensive older adults.
Hang, Fei; Chen, Jieruo; Wang, Zefeng; Zheng, Keyang; Wu, Yongquan.
Afiliação
  • Hang F; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, No.2 Anzhen Road, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Chen J; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, No.2 Anzhen Road, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Wang Z; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, No.2 Anzhen Road, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Zheng K; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, No.2 Anzhen Road, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Wu Y; Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, No.2 Anzhen Road, Beijing, 100029, China. wuyongquan_anzhen@163.com.
Lipids Health Dis ; 21(1): 62, 2022 Jul 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35869550
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Literature on the association between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among non-diabetic hypertensive older adults is quite limited.

METHODS:

A post-hoc analysis of data obtained from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial was performed. The predictive value of AIP on the risk of MACEs among non-diabetic hypertensive older adults was assessed to evaluate whether the benefit of intensive blood pressure (BP) control in preventing MACEs is consistent in different AIP subgroups.

RESULTS:

In this study, 9323 participants with AIP were included, out of which 561 (6.02%) had composite cardiovascular outcomes during a median of 3.22 years of follow-up. Patients in the highest AIP quartile had a significantly increased risk of the primary outcome. In the fully adjusted Model 3, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of the primary outcome for participants in Q2, Q3, and Q4 of AIP were 1.32 (1.02, 1.72), 1.38 (1.05, 1.81), and 1.56 (1.17, 2.08) respectively. Consistently, the trend test for the association between AIP quartiles and the primary outcome showed that a higher AIP quartile was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR (95%CI) in model 31.14 (1.04, 1.25), P = 0,004). However, within each AIP quartile, absolute event rates were lower in the intensive treatment group. No evidence was found for the interaction between intensive BP control and AIP for the risk of the primary outcome (P for interaction = 0.932).

CONCLUSION:

This study found that elevated AIP was independently and positively associated with the risk of MACEs among non-diabetic hypertensive older adults. The benefits of intensive BP control in managing cardiovascular events were consistent in different AIP subgroups.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article