Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Paclitaxel with or without pazopanib for ovarian cancer relapsing during bevacizumab maintenance therapy: The GINECO randomized phase II TAPAZ study.
Joly, Florence; Fabbro, Michel; Berton, Dominique; Lequesne, Justine; Anota, Amélie; Puszkiel, Alicja; Floquet, Anne; Vegas, Hélène; Bourgeois, Hugues; Bengrine Lefevre, Leïla; You, Benoît; Pommeret, Fanny; Lortholary, Alain; Spaeth, Dominique; Hardy-Bessard, Anne-Claire; Abdeddaim, Cyril; Kaminsky-Forrett, Marie-Christine; Tod, Michel; Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel; Del Piano, Francesco; Meunier, Jérôme; Raban, Nadia; Alexandre, Jérome; Mouret-Reynier, Marie-Ange; Ray-Coquard, Isabelle; Provansal Gross, Magali; Brachet, Pierre-Emmanuel.
Afiliação
  • Joly F; Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Anticipe Inserm U1086, Université Caen Normandie, Caen, France. Electronic address: f.joly@baclesse.unicancer.fr.
  • Fabbro M; Medical Oncology Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France. Electronic address: Michel.Fabbro@icm.unicancer.fr.
  • Berton D; Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France. Electronic address: dominique.berton@ico.unicancer.fr.
  • Lequesne J; Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France. Electronic address: j.lequesne@baclesse.unicancer.fr.
  • Anota A; Biostatistics Unit, Direction of Clinical Research and Innovation, Social and Human Sciences Department, and French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. Electronic address: Amelie.ANOTA@lyon.unicancer.fr.
  • Puszkiel A; Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: alicjapuszkiel@gmail.com.
  • Floquet A; Medical Oncology Department, Institute Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: a.floquet@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.
  • Vegas H; Medical Oncology Department, CHU Bretonneau Centre, Tours University, Tours, France. Electronic address: h.vegas@chu-tours.fr.
  • Bourgeois H; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Bernard - Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France. Electronic address: h.bourgeois@ilcgroupe.fr.
  • Bengrine Lefevre L; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France. Electronic address: lbengrine@cgfl.fr.
  • You B; Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France; Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Centre d'Investigation de Thérapeutiques en Oncologie et Hématologie de Lyon (CITOHL), Lyon, France. Electroni
  • Pommeret F; Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: fanny.pommeret@gustaveroussy.fr.
  • Lortholary A; Oncology Department, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France. Electronic address: alain.lortholary@groupeconfluent.fr.
  • Spaeth D; Oncology Department, Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France. Electronic address: d.spaeth@ilcgroupe.fr.
  • Hardy-Bessard AC; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Armoricain de Radiothérapie, d'Imagerie Médicale et d'Oncologie (CARIO)-Hôpital Privé des Côtes D'Armor (HPCA), Plérin, France. Electronic address: ac.hardy@cario-sante.fr.
  • Abdeddaim C; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France. Electronic address: c-abdeddaim@o-lambret.fr.
  • Kaminsky-Forrett MC; Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France. Electronic address: mc.kaminsky@nancy.unicancer.fr.
  • Tod M; Pharmacie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: michel.tod@chu-lyon.fr.
  • Kurtz JE; Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology & Hematology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: je.kurtz@icans.eu.
  • Del Piano F; Hôpitaux Du Léman, Thonon Les Bains, France. Electronic address: f-delpiano@ch-hopitauxduleman.fr.
  • Meunier J; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional, Orléans, France. Electronic address: jerome.meunier@chr-orleans.fr.
  • Raban N; Hôpital de la Milétrie, Poitiers, France. Electronic address: Nadia.RABAN@chu-poitiers.fr.
  • Alexandre J; Université de Paris, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, APHP Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin-Port Royal, Paris, France. Electronic address: jerome.alexandre@cch.aphp.fr.
  • Mouret-Reynier MA; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Electronic address: Marie-ange.mouret-reynier@clermont.unicancer.fr.
  • Ray-Coquard I; Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: isabelle.ray-coquard@lyon.unicancer.fr.
  • Provansal Gross M; Medical Oncology, Institute Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France. Electronic address: PROVANSALM@ipc.unicancer.fr.
  • Brachet PE; Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Anticipe Inserm U1086, Université Caen Normandie, Caen, France. Electronic address: brape@baclesse.unicancer.fr.
Gynecol Oncol ; 166(3): 389-396, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35902297
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anti-angiogenic rechallenge with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is effective in recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC); however, data are limited on tyrosine kinase inhibitors after progression on maintenance bevacizumab.

METHODS:

In the randomized phase II TAPAZ trial, patients with rOC during the first year of bevacizumab maintenance therapy were assigned 21 to either weekly paclitaxel 65 mg/m2 plus pazopanib 600-800 mg daily or standard weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS:

Overall, 116 patients were randomized and treated 79 with combination therapy and 37 with single-agent paclitaxel. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. There was no difference between treatment arms in 4-month PFS rate (61% [95% CI, 51-73%] with the combination versus 68% [95% CI, 54-85%] with paclitaxel alone), median PFS (4.9 [95% CI, 4.1-6.1] versus 5.8 [95% CI, 4.8-7.4] months, respectively) or median overall survival (13.6 versus 12.9 months, respectively). The combination was associated with more grade 3/4 toxicities (87% versus 70%, respectively) and toxicity-related paclitaxel discontinuations (22% versus 11%). Pazopanib was discontinued for toxicity in 44% of patients, most commonly for gastrointestinal and vascular events. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the combination arm (pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal perforation). At month 4, patient-reported outcomes deteriorated from baseline in the combination arm, particularly for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, which showed a clinically important difference versus paclitaxel alone.

CONCLUSIONS:

In rOC progressing during maintenance bevacizumab, adding pazopanib to paclitaxel did not improve efficacy, increased toxicity, and compromised chemotherapy delivery. CLINICALTRIALS govregistrationNCT02383251.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Paclitaxel Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Paclitaxel Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article